Register  Login

Private Property Rights 80% - Plus Supporters

Property rights are one of the BillsandVotes.com top three issues for 2010.  In America, real estate is meant to be owned by private citizens. But government has an endless stream of funding - called "taxes" - that it uses to take private property.  Government also has a long list of excuses for acquiring land.  The terms "eminent domain" and "acquire land," for example, occur 220 times in Minnesota Statutes.  But repatriating land to those it truly belongs to is a rare occurrence.  Bills to require state land sales to help balance the budget are watered-down by legislators and met with resistance by the Pawlenty administration. 

For now, 80 percent is a fair passing score, but as the number of scored votes increases, look for this threshold to increase. Click here to view all 2010 votes related to protecting private property.

Records 1-51 of 51  
 
Dist
Member
Policy   
Votes
Right
Scores
35B
Buesgens
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
11
 100%
29A
Demmer
Private Property Rights vs The State
10
10
 100%
52A
Dettmer
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
11
 100%
14
Fischbach
Private Property Rights vs The State
7
7
 100%
49
Johnson, D.
Private Property Rights vs The State
5
5
 100%
48
Jungbauer
Private Property Rights vs The State
6
6
 100%
16B
Kiffmeyer
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
11
 100%
34A
Kohls
Private Property Rights vs The State
9
9
 100%
24
Rosen, J.
Private Property Rights vs The State
7
7
 100%
14A
Severson
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
11
 100%
52
Vandeveer
Private Property Rights vs The State
8
8
 100%
19A
Anderson, B.
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
10
 90%
41A
Downey
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
10
 90%
28B
Drazkowski
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
10
 90%
17A
Eastlund
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
10
 90%
19B
Emmer, T.
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
10
 90%
15A
Gottwalt
Private Property Rights vs The State
10
9
 90%
28A
Kelly
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
10
 90%
32A
Peppin
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
10
 90%
21A
Seifert
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
10
 90%
18A
Shimanski
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
10
 90%
32B
Zellers
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
10
 90%
49A
Scott
Private Property Rights vs The State
9
8
 88%
52B
Dean
Private Property Rights vs The State
8
7
 87%
37
Gerlach
Private Property Rights vs The State
8
7
 87%
13
Gimse
Private Property Rights vs The State
8
7
 87%
11
Ingebrigtsen
Private Property Rights vs The State
8
7
 87%
19
Koch
Private Property Rights vs The State
8
7
 87%
32
Limmer
Private Property Rights vs The State
8
7
 87%
41
Michel
Private Property Rights vs The State
8
7
 87%
34
Ortman, J.
Private Property Rights vs The State
8
7
 87%
35
Robling
Private Property Rights vs The State
8
7
 87%
29
Senjem
Private Property Rights vs The State
8
7
 87%
12
Koering
Private Property Rights vs The State
7
6
 85%
13A
Anderson, P.
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
43A
Anderson, S.
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
35A
Beard
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
25A
Brod
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
31B
Davids
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
36B
Garofalo
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
24A
Gunther
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
48A
Hackbarth
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
22B
Hamilton
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
37A
Mack
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
22A
Magnus
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
10A
Nornes
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
51A
Sanders
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
33A
Smith
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
21B
Torkelson
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
11A
Westrom
Private Property Rights vs The State
11
9
 81%
36A
Holberg
Private Property Rights vs The State
10
8
 80%
Privacy Statement  Terms Of Use
);